FS Protection PC Release 190

[Deleted User]

This release contains following applications that combined make the FS Protection PC product:

• Common Component Framework 2.90.182
• Antivirus 17.190.113
• Browsing protection 2.190.5792

New features:

Browsing protection:

• Time limits settings change is supported from portal.

Removed features:

• F-Secure Safe Search has been discontinued and was removed. The browser extensions installed by Safe Search will be removed by this upgrade. Search provider must be removed manually.

Fixed issues:

Common:

• Added explicit "No thank you" -option for Family Rules setup prompt (CTS-99081)
• Deadlock in core component, causes whole product to stop working (CTS-99082)
• Family Rules setup fails with "Something went wrong" if Windows "Network Service" account belongs to "Administrators" group (CTS-99106)
• Installation may fail if Windows device name contains non-ASCII characters (CTS-99124)
• Custom proxy address allows entering any strings, including Unicode (CTS-99125)
• Client unable to synchronize settings with Safe Home under certain circumstances (CTS-99202)
• "Protecting <user>" not shown properly under rare circumstances (CTS-99205)
• User can get stuck in "Try again" loop when login error happens (CTS-99221)
• Client stops downloading upgrades until reboot in rare circumstances (CTS-99276)

Antivirus:

• "Firewall is disabled" in main UI (CTS-99168)
• Computer Security - Firewall Status Wrong (CTS-99216)
• In Tools tab, Virus scan options are still visible after selecting option (CTS-99243)
• Main GUI menus don't disappear (CTS-99268)
• Main GUI, mouse pointer goes to "text mode" wrongly (CTS-99269)
• Fsfilecontrol.exe is locked and AV requires reboot (CTS-99245)
• Unable to scan (CTS-99137, SAFE_BUG-01633)
• Hoster crash when stopping service (CTS-99239)
• Updating status changes to ok when Browsing protection is turned off (CTS-99172)
• Compsec main gui shows wrong info when product is expired (CTS-99122)
• Conflicting status in main UI (CTS-99204)
• Main GUI "Submit a sample" button not hidden when disabled in settings (CTS-99233)
• Fs protection main page settings or shield icon unaligned (CTS-99191)
• Strings truncated in WTS flyer in some languages / resolutions (CTS-99105)
• Computer Security - Main GUI Initially Shows Incorrect Status (CTS-99092)
• Main GUI inconsistent with "Turn off" and Browsing Protection status (CTS-99149)
• OAS detection flyer not shown (CTS-99246)
• Antivirus status in GUI not refreshed properly after turn off and turn on (CTS-99156)
• Application and file control message box icons (CTS-98850)
• RDT: After TP187 upgraded to TP188, "Firewall is disabled" in main UI (CTS-99168)
• Browsing protection status not correctly reported after "Turn on" operation (CTS-99155)
• Shield not trigger UAC prompt for "Open last scanning report" (CTS-99151)

Browsing protection:  

• After TP187 to TP188 upgrade, Browsing protection status is "not active" in UI and in settings the related switch button is not visible (CTS-99167)
• Content filtering appears disabled after 2nd user has set up family rules (CTS-99052)
  
• Family Rules tab localization
• Web site exceptions a.k.a. allow/deny lists do not work (CTS-99275)
• "Allow web site" button in block page does not work ( CTS-99159 )
  
• "Home page" button on block page removed (CTS-99199)  
• Browser extension stopped working (CTS-99165) 

Ukko

Hello,

 

Thanks for release!

 

And sorry for ask...

 

Just interesting - does it impossible to recover list of allow/deny lists (I mean URLs, which was under the lists before update)?

Simon

Is there something to replace Safe Search?  I can imagine some people will perhaps be unhappy with its removal.  

betoche

Greate work.thankyou for improvement's

nanonyme

Hey,

Regarding allow and block lists: I'm afraid they can't safely automatically be recovered if machine was already updated to latest TP. Did you have a significant amount of configurations there?

Ukko

Hello,

 

With my main system (with FS Protection) there was not really "significant amount". Basically I also expected that there can be such situation (when Family Rules introduced and happened "missing support" for allow/deny lists) - so, I did 'backup' manually for current lists... but eventually I did not find it (maybe I randomly removed this file). URLs which was not forgotten by me about just thirty (mainly 'deny'-list) and I re-add them.

 

But with my experience - some of my devices (and on current time - still?! like that also) have lists with thousand URLs (at least a little be less than two thousands URLs - generally 'deny', but also 'allowed' - when I checked it last time about count); Because there missing export/import - re-add it (as after re-installation too) not funny action. So my latest experience and most common systems with less size (maybe hundreds);

 

I think that this is not common situation and using this lists designed to be with another view (such as -> most of URLs under allow-list can be re-rated by F-Secure SAS;  and deny-list can be just with small size of URLs);

 

 

Spoiler

But I can to think about potential situation, when "such situation" can be not really nice with "expected usage" (and with my main systems, where installed F-Secure SAFE it can be valid); That if we have multiple accounts (with "user's account", where adding to allow-list (or deny) required "administrator's" rights/credentials) - with such system there can be quite many allowed-websites (or deny) - generally if we use content blocker/family rules; 

And mainly if we do not remember this URLs (and added "per access requirement") - there can be more steps, than we able to want (if we do not able allow access to website on-the-fly as with administrator-account);

 

 

betoche

hello updated to new version and everything is cool  but High RAM Usage and system is slow






..

 

almost 500mb! 

nanonyme

You don't normally have that many fshoster processes unless there was a crash. Have you filed a bug?