FS Protection PC Release 190
- Common Component Framework 2.90.182
- Antivirus 17.190.113
- Browsing protection 2.190.5792
New features:
Browsing protection:
- Time limits settings change is supported from portal.
Removed features:
- F-Secure Safe Search has been discontinued and was removed. The browser extensions installed by Safe Search will be removed by this upgrade. Search provider must be removed manually.
Fixed issues:
Common:
- Added explicit "No thank you" -option for Family Rules setup prompt (CTS-99081)
- Deadlock in core component, causes whole product to stop working (CTS-99082)
- Family Rules setup fails with "Something went wrong" if Windows "Network Service" account belongs to "Administrators" group (CTS-99106)
- Installation may fail if Windows device name contains non-ASCII characters (CTS-99124)
- Custom proxy address allows entering any strings, including Unicode (CTS-99125)
- Client unable to synchronize settings with Safe Home under certain circumstances (CTS-99202)
- "Protecting <user>" not shown properly under rare circumstances (CTS-99205)
- User can get stuck in "Try again" loop when login error happens (CTS-99221)
- Client stops downloading upgrades until reboot in rare circumstances (CTS-99276)
Antivirus:
- "Firewall is disabled" in main UI (CTS-99168)
- Computer Security - Firewall Status Wrong (CTS-99216)
- In Tools tab, Virus scan options are still visible after selecting option (CTS-99243)
- Main GUI menus don't disappear (CTS-99268)
- Main GUI, mouse pointer goes to "text mode" wrongly (CTS-99269)
- Fsfilecontrol.exe is locked and AV requires reboot (CTS-99245)
- Unable to scan (CTS-99137, SAFE_BUG-01633)
- Hoster crash when stopping service (CTS-99239)
- Updating status changes to ok when Browsing protection is turned off (CTS-99172)
- Compsec main gui shows wrong info when product is expired (CTS-99122)
- Conflicting status in main UI (CTS-99204)
- Main GUI "Submit a sample" button not hidden when disabled in settings (CTS-99233)
- Fs protection main page settings or shield icon unaligned (CTS-99191)
- Strings truncated in WTS flyer in some languages / resolutions (CTS-99105)
- Computer Security - Main GUI Initially Shows Incorrect Status (CTS-99092)
- Main GUI inconsistent with "Turn off" and Browsing Protection status (CTS-99149)
- OAS detection flyer not shown (CTS-99246)
- Antivirus status in GUI not refreshed properly after turn off and turn on (CTS-99156)
- Application and file control message box icons (CTS-98850)
- RDT: After TP187 upgraded to TP188, "Firewall is disabled" in main UI (CTS-99168)
- Browsing protection status not correctly reported after "Turn on" operation (CTS-99155)
- Shield not trigger UAC prompt for "Open last scanning report" (CTS-99151)
Browsing protection:
- After TP187 to TP188 upgrade, Browsing protection status is "not active" in UI and in settings the related switch button is not visible (CTS-99167)
- Content filtering appears disabled after 2nd user has set up family rules (CTS-99052)
- Family Rules tab localization
- Web site exceptions a.k.a. allow/deny lists do not work (CTS-99275)
- "Allow web site" button in block page does not work ( CTS-99159 )
- "Home page" button on block page removed (CTS-99199)
- Browser extension stopped working (CTS-99165)
Comments
-
Hello,
With my main system (with FS Protection) there was not really "significant amount". Basically I also expected that there can be such situation (when Family Rules introduced and happened "missing support" for allow/deny lists) - so, I did 'backup' manually for current lists... but eventually I did not find it (maybe I randomly removed this file). URLs which was not forgotten by me about just thirty (mainly 'deny'-list) and I re-add them.
But with my experience - some of my devices (and on current time - still?! like that also) have lists with thousand URLs (at least a little be less than two thousands URLs - generally 'deny', but also 'allowed' - when I checked it last time about count); Because there missing export/import - re-add it (as after re-installation too) not funny action. So my latest experience and most common systems with less size (maybe hundreds);
I think that this is not common situation and using this lists designed to be with another view (such as -> most of URLs under allow-list can be re-rated by F-Secure SAS; and deny-list can be just with small size of URLs);
SpoilerBut I can to think about potential situation, when "such situation" can be not really nice with "expected usage" (and with my main systems, where installed F-Secure SAFE it can be valid); That if we have multiple accounts (with "user's account", where adding to allow-list (or deny) required "administrator's" rights/credentials) - with such system there can be quite many allowed-websites (or deny) - generally if we use content blocker/family rules;
And mainly if we do not remember this URLs (and added "per access requirement") - there can be more steps, than we able to want (if we do not able allow access to website on-the-fly as with administrator-account);