turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for
- F-Secure Community
- :
- About martink
About martink
since
23-04-2012
2 hours ago
martink
Executive Member
195
Posts
50
Kudos
7
Solutions
yesterday
When I run F-Secure Online scanner at the completition it claims that my PC is not protected. Look at the system tray: The icons for ULAV and Freedome are there. Do they not count as protection?
... View more
yesterday
Ei se nyt minulle tässä tapauksessa riitä eikä se ole käyttäjäystävällistä. Voihan niin tehdä, jos halua karkoittaa käyttäjät. Kun hakee paikkakunnan katsastusasemilta aikaa tietylle päivälle useimmiten joutuu antamaan ajoneuvon tiedot ensin ennenkuin aikoja näytetään. Jos ei sopivaa löydy mennään varauksessa takaperin alkuun ja sitten seuraavalle asemalle. Kun sitten lopulta löytyy aika, niin pankkiyhteyden avaamisen jälkeen ei enää selaimessa näe, millä asemalla lykästi.
... View more
yesterday
Kiitti. Se kertoo, miten pankkitoimintojen suojaus menee päälle ja mitä se tekee Pankki-istunnon aikana kun olet luotetussa pankkisivustossa. Silmiini ei osunut, mitä tapahtuu pankki-istunnon jälkeen tai pitääkö käyttäjän tehdä jotain päästäkseen taas vapaasti surffailemaan.
... View more
yesterday
Kiitos vastauksista. Kyse ei ollut siitä, etteikö katsastuksen varaus olisi toiminut. Joo kyllä pankin taspahtumatiedoista näkee, onko maksu suoritettu. Muut varauksen tiedot eivät siinä näy. Joo ne näkyvät varauksen vahvistussähköpostissa, jonka saapuminen ilmeisesti osoittaa varauksen tapahtuneen, jos oikean sähköpostin on antanut. Tiedot näkyy myös tekstiviestissäaj muistaakseni puhelinnumero oli varaustiedoissa pakollinen. Oman käyttäjäni kannalta olisi varausta suunnitellessa mukavaa saada nopeasti ja helposti tietää milloin asemalla on vapaita aikoja. Tuo järjestelmä kuitenkin haluaa ensin asiakkaan auton tiedot kertoakseen milloin on katsastusaika ja mitä voi katsastaa. Kun on vapaita aikoja hakenut parilta asemalta se on jo kyllä selvinnyt ellei sitä heti alussa tiedä. Tämä ei ollut testicase, eikä sitä voi halutessa toistaa, ellei halua tehdä montaa maksullista varausta. Paluu URL ei siksi ole tallella, vaan se katosi saman tien. Refresh ja back eivät enää auttaneet. On tietysti mahdollista, että juuri tässä tapauksessa paluussa olisi ongelma. Saman tyyppinen ongelma on ollut aikaisemminkin ja silloin on päässyt takaisin myyjän sivulle otettuani Bankin Protectionin pois päältä. Yritänpä ensi kerralla ottaa osoitteen talteen. Banking Protectionin pitäisi suojata silloin, kun syötetään maksukortti- tai verkkopankkitietoja. Pankin sivuilla ja verkkokaupan sivuilla on erona se, että pankin sivuilla on suojauksen tarve kaikilla sivuilla ja verkkokaupan sivuilla vain maksamiseen ja ehkä tilaukseen liittyvillä sivuilla, mutta ei kaikilla. Verkkokaupassa käyttäjä voi vielä jatkuvasti surffata näiden sivujen välillä eli tilata ja katsella muita tuotteita. Pystyykö Banking Protection hoitamaan tuon jatkuvarn surffaamisen noiden erityyppisten sivujen välillä? Onko se kuvattu jossain dokumentaatiossa? F-Secure on yleensä niin helppokäyttöinen, ettei dokumentaation ole tarvinnut tutustua.
... View more
Friday
1 Kudo
Having problem with the banking protection again. Made a reservation on K1-Katsastus (vehichle scrutineering). When I entered payment Banking protection kicks in. Fine Completed the payment with Verkkopankki (direct debit from my bank account). Clicked return to the sellers site. Site blocked Usually in case like this ending Banking protection and refreshing the page takes me back to where I should normally be directed. In this case page not found and details of my reservation gone for ever from my eyes. Apparently they were already entered in the sellers system. This behaviour of the Banking protection that after firing it once it blocks the sites where you might be entering payment details until I close the browser ain't working properly, because the non-payment date related to the session on the sellers site is lost when the browser is closed. I should think that stopping Banking protection manually would do the trick, but it is too unreliable to rely on the user to remember that. So which is the lesser of the evils no Bankin protection or losing the non-bank-payment related data? This was on Common Component Framework 2.91 build 198
... View more
2 weeks ago
This is the response I got Greetings, Thank you for your submission. It seems that the submitted url is no longer active thus we are unable to verify the issue further. We will continue to monitor the situation for similar activities and will take necessary action to avoid such similar attacks in the future. If there is anything else we can help you with, please do not hesitate to contact us again. Best regards, ******** Malware Analyst F-Secure Security Labs I also heard from another source that Google had fixed the problem so that the users did not do anything.
... View more
2 weeks ago
Thanks @Laksh Did submit the sample. It occured on May 3 and on that day there is nothing in the above list of events.
... View more
3 weeks ago
So I should expect the blocking occur when I click the URL of the malicious web page, But I don*t see that in the TP events
... View more
3 weeks ago
1 Kudo
Thank you Ukko. So what I should expect is that TP and ULAv should block the site once the pishing attempt has been recognized by F-S and added to the black list. Malware protection does not stop you from entering personal data or giving access to it.
... View more
3 weeks ago
1 Kudo
Thanks Ukko With recent I mean that it happened recently not considering whether or not it has happened before. Judging by the dates of these articles https://www.vox.com/new-money/2017/5/3/15534984/google-docs-phishing-hack https://nakedsecurity.sophos.com/2017/05/05/google-phish-thats-a-worm-what-happened-and-what-to-do/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+nakedsecurity+%28Naked+Security+-+Sophos%29 it happened recently. As the articles explain - you would get an email from somebody you know (or even from who you are expecting an email) - the addressee (list) might look OK and - the message might look OK though either or both might look fishy if you look at them closely - there is a link to Google doc in the email - the link takes you to somethere else and there you are asked to give permissions to your contacts and email account If you get that far and do that is it, you fell for it. Glanced quickly through the pages to which you posted links. Did not catch anything about this. What I should imagine is The email should be stopped if you are in a system where there is emailserver protection. Web mail would get to to your inbox. In my case it was Gmail so google did not stop that, and Thunderbird. So I take F-S works more on browsers than email clients. What should happen if you try open the link ? TP, ULAV and Safe browser if you are using that should block access and say it is harmful. If the articles where dated May 3, then the scam already had a reputation by then. If you, howver, go past that and get to the page which ask to give permissions I should expect banking protection to fire. Well, it is not, but still asking pur sensitive informantion and I've seen banking protection being trigger happy so many times that this kind of thing should be programmable for an alert: Alert: Do you realize what the page is asking. Keep you head straight do not give permissions to your personal data or your account.
... View more
3 weeks ago
1 Kudo
Say you get an email with the recent Google Docs pishing attempt. Which of the F-Secure software should stop you getting there and what would be the message? TP? ULAV? Freedome?
... View more
4 weeks ago
1 Kudo
Thanks @Ukko OK it is a known problem that the Allo button is broken.
... View more
4 weeks ago
My work around is to try to access such a site with another PC that has a different F-S product or malware protection from another supplier. The last resort is to disable F-S which requires a lot of consideration as then anything could come through.
... View more
4 weeks ago
1 Kudo
I was buying something in a shop and when I proceeded to payment Banking Protection jumped in Fine. After having completed the payment the page wanted to take me back to the shop. However Banking Protection did not allow that. I should expect clicking Allow Web Site to get me there, but it did not. It opened the W10 dialog about allowing F-Secure to make changes. Clicking Yes there took me back to this screen. Clicking End ended the Banking session and took me back. Product is not working as desired is it working as designed and just W10 playing a trick on the user?
... View more
4 weeks ago
Thanks Laksh
... View more
a month ago
I do have another bunch of codes. I'd like to know if they are are valid. Is the proper way to contact support of send another private message to https://community.f-secure.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/24565
... View more
a month ago
Same thing with Bitdefender. Now updated and not reporting harmful any more.
... View more
27-04-2017
02:42 PM
2 Kudos
I submitted the URL and got this response The URL you submitted was blocked by our security product because there's child pages was previously used as a malicious site. This is however no longer the case. Our security products have been updated to rate the submitted URL as safe. The updated rating will take effect automatically. and apology for the delay. Thanks F-S
... View more
21-04-2017
11:40 AM
1 Kudo
Correction I did have the session still open. Apparently I was just too hasty to quit after 10 minutes. Chat is working.
... View more
21-04-2017
11:34 AM
Thanks again Laksh, I've closed the browser since then so I don't know how could I go back to the session to check. Definitely there is a problem, but everything else seems to be working OK so I do not know how to check the connections. Anyway you already answere my question which I wanted to ask the tecnician, thank you.
... View more
21-04-2017
11:15 AM
1 Kudo
Thanks Ukko, I've submitted the sample. What they say about Gihoo 360 is that it is used by millions. With ULAV a more descriptive message would be beneficial so that the user can conclude whether it is a valid address or not and an indication if it considered harmful.
... View more
21-04-2017
10:58 AM
Thanks Laksh, Now I know I have used it. Just tried chat again with a faster connection and no VPN. No technician after ten minutes.
... View more
20-04-2017
10:36 PM
When I try to access 360 security page for downloading the Windows version I get That is with TP. Is it posible to see why that is reported as harmful? If yes then where? Some other security products do not block that page. With ULAV the message ain't that clear Is that as designed?
... View more
20-04-2017
09:54 PM
Thanks Laksh, I was out today and could not try it. Previously, as you can see from the time stamp, I've tried very early. I do not do calls to support, because then I am doing the service of waiting and not getting it and secondly I have to be there the whole time from initiating the call to getting the answer. The issue is a code which I got bundled with a Safe package. The code is supposed to be for 6 months for Safe for one user. I do not have any record of having used that, but I get the message that it is not valid. I wanted to ask if you can tell whether the code is unused and valid. Don't want to post it here.
... View more
19-04-2017
11:22 PM
Would you believe I use Freedome and the speed ain't anything fancy. I can understand the disconnection after waiting for a couple of hours for the technician. Will try without Freedome on a faster connection. Are you saying with a faster connection you do get a response from a technician? I did not get any response.
... View more
19-04-2017
12:39 PM
Is the Chat with F-Secure Expert working? Tried that on a couple of days with the same result.
... View more
18-04-2017
11:10 PM
So the answer seems to be that mz device is not tracked. In theory that is good, but in this case the consequences are not good as I have to release the license and specify my device again in the case of an update. After I have released the license I have the speficy the device again. This time the upgrade has no problemm pulling the brand and model of my device. Why did it not do that before the licences was released and compare it to the entries in the list and in case of a match ask my confirmation and only when there is no confirmed match ask for the release. Some people do expect systems where you login to remember your details.
... View more
12-04-2017
08:27 AM
I've been working low performance PC's and always wondering if there is performance lost having F-S installed and at the same time Windows standard tools like Defender and Malicious program removal tool updated every month. The latest Windows version seems to have initiated actions from other antimalware developpers. Again I am wondering are the Windows tools needed with F-S, can they co-exist, does F-S limit their functionality, can the users disable them in any other way than manually (eg unselect the download of the Malware removal tool monthly) and so on. Is that explained to the user somewhere?
... View more
11-04-2017
10:20 AM
1 Kudo
Just wondering again... Who is the admin I should contact?
... View more
11-04-2017
10:19 AM
1 Kudo
There seems to be some recognition of the device, however, as when I release a license and start doing the update the software suggest a name for the device which has some sort of relation to the hardware at lest on mobile devices. Whne trying to do the update on one device this morgning it just would not release the license after clickking Confirm and eventually got this This particular device is on WiFI only, but that should not make a difference and does not affect other functionality.
... View more
